Looking Back on the Solar Cycle 25 Propagation Series

 

Looking Back on the Solar Cycle 25 Propagation Series

Why engaging with the science matters

Over the past months I’ve published a short series of articles looking at HF propagation through the lens of Solar Cycle 25. What began as an exercise in analysing my own monitoring data gradually turned into something broader: an exploration of how much useful propagation science can be done using amateur-collected data, modest equipment, and a willingness to look beyond day-to-day operating.

The series covered topics such as MUF dynamics, lower-band absorption at solar maximum, seasonal effects on 40 m, geomagnetic storm behaviour, late-day persistence on the higher HF bands, and the early signs of solar-cycle decline. Individually, each topic stands on its own. Taken together, they tell a more important story.

A consistent theme: observation beats assumption

One recurring theme throughout the series was the gap between what we expect propagation to do and what it actually does.

Assumptions such as:

  • “solar maximum improves all bands”

  • “high bands simply close at a certain time”

  • “geomagnetic storms are just bad conditions”

don’t survive sustained observation very well. When looked at through long-running datasets, whether CW from the Reverse Beacon Network or WSPR, propagation reveals itself as structured, nuanced, and often counter-intuitive.

That is where the scientific side of amateur radio begins.

Why the science side is worth engaging with

It’s easy to think of propagation science as something abstract or academic, but the reality is far more practical. Understanding why bands behave the way they do improves:

  • band choice

  • timing

  • expectations

  • and ultimately operating results

More importantly, it turns operating into observation. Instead of asking “is the band open?”, the question becomes “what is the ionosphere doing today, and why?”.

That shift in mindset is subtle, but it changes how you listen.

Amateur data really does have value

A key takeaway from this series is that amateur-generated data is not second-rate. Networks such as RBN and WSPR provide:

  • continuous coverage

  • global participation

  • long-term archives

  • sensitivity to marginal conditions

When viewed over time, these datasets respond coherently to solar, seasonal, and geomagnetic influences. They are not noise - they are measurements.

In many cases, amateurs notice changes in reliability, timing, and band behaviour before those changes are obvious in smoothed indices or prediction plots. That alone makes sustained amateur monitoring scientifically interesting.

You don’t need a laboratory to contribute

Another important point is accessibility. Engaging with the science side of amateur radio does not require specialist equipment or complex setups.

Many amateurs already:

  • run WSJT-X

  • collect WSPR spots

  • upload data continuously without thinking much about it

The step from using that data to learning from it is surprisingly small. Even receive-only stations make a meaningful contribution - without monitors, there is no dataset.

Why this series mattered

Looking back, the real value of the Solar Cycle 25 series was not any single conclusion, but the demonstration that:

  • careful listening matters

  • long-term data matters

  • asking the right questions matters

Propagation is not just something that happens to us while we operate. It is something we can observe, study, and understand - and amateur radio provides a unique way of doing that.

This article reflects a combination of traditional amateur radio experimentation and modern AI assisted analysis, where original data and direction are provided by the author and advanced tools enable deeper exploration and presentation of the results.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is the 4m Band Always Open? - Part 2

  Is the 4m Band Always Open? - Part 2 A Data-Driven Look Using the GB3MBD Propagation Beacon The previous article in this series covered an analysis of reception reports of the GB3MBD beacon from my perspective, ie the spots reported just by me. This follow up looks at all spots from everyone reporting reception of the beacon during the period February 2024 to November 2025. During this period there were 829 reports from 495 days reported to the Beaconspot.UK database from stations across the UK, EI and EU. The results show that 4m is far more active, and more often open than most  realise. 1. Where the Data Comes From (and why it matters) The entire analysis is based on the Beaconspot.uk archive maintained by the UK Microwave Group . This isn’t an automated monitoring system, it collects voluntary spots that are :  Posted to the Cluster system by stations who hear or decode a beacon Or uploaded directly to the Beaconspot.uk site As a result: If no o...
Read more

Exploring 40MHz Propagation with WSPR

  Exploring 40MHz Propagation with WSPR  Over the past year, I have been running a 40MHz WSPR beacon under a UK Ofcom Trial and Innovation Licence. Operating at 1W into a dipole (08:00–20:00 UTC daily), this beacon has provided a unique opportunity to study propagation at a seldom-used part of the spectrum — sitting between the well-known 10m (28 MHz) and 6m (50MHz) amateur bands. WSPR (Weak Signal Propagation Reporter) proved invaluable here. By capturing reports far below the noise floor, and thanks to the WSPRnet permanent archive the dataset reveals detailed trends in signal-to-noise ratio, distance, and time of day across thousands of reception reports. Key Findings Sporadic-E dominates : Most spots fell in the 800–2,200 km range, especially during summer. F2-layer events — rare but remarkable : On 29 November 2024 , the beacon was received over 8,600 km away , a clear signature of F2-layer propagation. The F2 region, forming 250–400 km above Earth,...
Read more

Solar Maximum and Lower-Band Absorption

  Solar Maximum and Lower-Band Absorption Why 40 metres does not simply improve at solar maximum Each solar maximum brings a familiar expectation among HF operators: if the Sun is more active, surely all bands should benefit. When 10 metres begins producing regular and sometimes spectacular openings, it is natural to assume that 40 metres will also improve in some obvious and sustained way. In practice, that expectation is often disappointed. Many operators find that daytime performance on 40m remains unchanged, or even feels worse, during periods of high solar activity. Using spot data sent to the Reverse Beacon Network (RBN) spanning late 2024 through 2025, this article looks at why that experience is not only common, but entirely consistent with how the ionosphere behaves near solar maximum. The simple intuition - and its limitation The intuitive picture most of us carry is straightforward: more solar activity produces more ionisation, more ionisation should improve...
Read more